In recent years, the “China threat theory” has become increasingly fierce in the world’s public opinion field. US Trade Representative Lighthizer once said in public that China and China’s industrial policies have brought unprecedented threats to the world’s trade system. The United States has made frequent small moves. In November 2017, the US Department of Commerce Babaylan ruled that Chinese companies dumped hardwood plywood in the United States by 183.36%, while the Chinese government’s subsidy for enterprises ranged from 22.98% to 194.90%, and anti-dumping duties will be imposed based on this.
Recently, US President Trump announced that global safeguards for imported photovoltaic products and large washing machines will be adopted for 4-year and 3-year respectively, with tariffs of 30% and 50% respectively. In fact, in 2012 and 2014, the United States had already imposed an anti-dumping duty of 35% to 65% on China’s photovoltaic products, and in December 2016, it also imposed an anti-dumping duty of 32% to 52% on large washing machines in China. The US seems to be a measure to protect its own economy, but in fact it is an excessive protection of domestic products, which is not conducive to the overall healthy development of the US industry and further deteriorates the global trade environment of related products.
U.S. CIA Director Pompeo recently said in an exclusive interview with the BBC that China is trying to steal US intelligence and secretly spread China’s influence around the world. In addition, Australia also said it is currently facing unprecedented intelligence infiltration and espionage threats, and China is listed as an “extreme threat” by the Australian intelligence agencies.
This kind of crazy hype of the “China Threat TheoryBabaylan” has aroused the vigilance and concern of some knowledgeable people in Australia. Australian political commentator Graham Richardson published an article in the Australian on January 31, saying, “Australia has always said ‘no’ to China. Whether it is the Belt and Road Initiative or the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Australia has turned a deaf ear and turned a blind eye. We have made a lot of noise about China’s influence to anger the Chinese, all of which is targeting a country that contributes 25% of our country’s total trade volume.” Richardson also wrote: “Our Cabinet Ministers have provoked our largest trading partners, especially when they say ‘a href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks‘s biggest trading partner, especially when they say ‘a href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Cinema‘s unreasonable moment like Mattis (US Secretary of Defense) makes me feel like our economy is committing suicide. ”
”What do you think in your heart, what is the world in your eyes? In this sense, it is not surprising that the world’s largest intelligence leader said such a thing. “Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying responded to the “Chinese spy threat theory” of the US and Australian intelligence departments at a regular press conference on the 1st, and slapped the speaker hard. “The facts are better than Babaylan‘s words. According to various information disclosed in recent years, everyone is actually very clear about who is implementing large-scale monitoring, monitoring, stealing secrets and infiltration in other countries, and is using its extreme support and exerting influence. “
Some Western politicians and media are keen on hyping the “China threat”. Various arguments and views are disregarding facts and ridiculous. The world’s economic growth is weak and the financial crisis is still dark, but China can maintain a good development momentum. In addition, China’s politics, culture, and lifestyle are very different from the West. Driven by the continuation of Cold War thinking, ideological differences, and national interests, China naturally becomes a “threat” criticized by Western media.
Vice Dean of the Institute of International Relations of Tsinghua University and Education href=”https://comicmov.com/”>BabaylanSupervised Zhao Kejin pointed out that in the face of the historic changes in the balance of power between China and the West, some Westerners attempt to confuse the public by clamoring the “China threat theory” in the international community, cover up the unreasonable and unfair international interest pattern, and cover up the hegemony of the weak. But a new round of “China threatBabaylan‘s theory is tantamount to a “straw that cannot save lives”, reflecting the “imperial mentality” and uneasiness of some countries’ attempt to dominate the world forever.
On January 26, at a press conference held by the State Council Information Office, a US CNN reporter asked, does China have military intentions in Arctic policy?
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Kong Xuanyou responded that China’s fundamental goal of participating in the development and utilization of the Arctic is to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results for all parties and promote sustainable development of the Arctic. China’s participation in the development and utilization of the Arctic is a contribution to the Arctic, and it brings developmentThe opportunities for exhibition benefit the people of the Arctic region. “Some people may still have some doubts about our participation in Arctic development, and are worried that we have other plans, or plunder resources and destroy the environment. I think this worry is complete. There is no need for Cinema.” We are not Cinema to invade and plunder, and there is nothing to hide. “No offside, no absent” is China’s basic positioning in Arctic affairs. Kong Xuanyou said that “not offside” means that China, as a non-Arctic country, will not intervene in affairs that are entirely between Arctic countries and within the Arctic region. China will participate in Arctic affairs in accordance with international law and guide Chinese entities and individuals to carry out Arctic activities in accordance with international law and the domestic law of the Arctic. “Not missing” means that China, as an important stakeholder in Arctic affairs, will actively play a constructive role in cross-regional and global issues of the Arctic.
In fact, Western public opinion has always promoted the “China threat theory” around China’s participation in Arctic affairs.
Ren Zhangxia, the director of the Polar Strategy Research Office of the China Polar Research Center, said that the “China threat theory” has a long history, such as “China’s resource hunger theory” and “China’s investment harmful theory” and other related arguments emerge one after another. Many of these views are absurd and ridiculous in disregarding the facts, and are obviously intentional, aiming to delay or even hinder China and other countries from achieving mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Regarding this kind of wrong argument, Zhang Xia believes that on the one hand, we must refute it firmly and issue China’s voice. The white paper “China’s Arctic Policy” is a good policy basis. On the other hand, speak with facts.
About whether China is seeking global hegemony, Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said during a discussion with the editorial board of the United States Today that in the past few decades, China has been in the process of so-called “rise” and many of the United States havePeople have a “panic” about the rapidly rising China. But after understanding China’s culture and development goals more and better, you will find that China does not think that any country can truly dominate the world, and has no intention of seeking global dominance. We advocate that all members of the international community strengthen cooperation, and our goal is to build a community of shared future for mankind. China has a very clear positioning of itself: our priority goal is still how to govern its country better and how to better meet people’s yearning for a better life, because every country must first solve its own problems. At the same time, we will further strengthen our ties with the international community and make greater contributions to the international community.
The “China Threat Theory” is constantly being heard. In fact, it is also reminding the rising China that there will be many obstacles on the road to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. What we can do is to change the international community’s perception of China with practical actions and break the slurs of the “China Threat Theory”. China should make a strong rebuttal in response to forces that deliberately fabricate the “China threat” regardless of facts. By actively participating in international affairs and playing a key role, we will establish the image of a responsible major power.
The “China threat theory” is ultimately the product of Western habits looking at the world with a sense of “superiority”. For the West, correcting attitude and correctly viewing China’s rise is the only way to live in peace with China. For China, the only way to break the “China threat theory” is to implement the Chinese solution – build a community with a shared future for mankind and achieve win-win results.