On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked that in a recent speech on China policy toward Komiks, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of liesKomiks, which reverses black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. CinemaThe most serious and long-term challenge to the international order is the most appropriate one. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the US side is to put it bluntly, it is the international order based on American rules, and it is the hegemonic order that uses “family laws and regulations” to dominate the world. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy Komiks·The Fatal Output of America”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfered with at least 3.Democratic elections in 0 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 2,000 refugees have been generated in the victim countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Economic Cooperation, and the United Nations Highway Treaty. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and launches a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, where is the rule Cinema? Where are the rules when the United States continues to owe the United Nations $1 billion in Cinema fees and $1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and four-party mechanisms, it attempts to create a Print-Pacific version of NATO,ChaosKomiksAsia and Pacific, what are the rules when destroying the international nuclear non-proliferation system? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a so-called “democracy summit” that separates the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirmed that the US tariff war against China violated global trade rules, but the US did not enforce it or even obstructed the WTO Appellate Body to serve as a new judge, what are the rules?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States places domestic laws above international law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and the domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. Instead of stopping sanctions from the United States, the United States has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly clear about the market competition principles and international economic and trade principles that the United States advocates, and will only be followed by the United States when they are favorable to the United States. What American politicians talk about is fair competition and free trade, and what they believe in is that the United States is preferred, and the American stick is waving in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land from other countries. We insist on resolving the dispute through dialogue and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintains the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. It proves and will continue to prove,China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of the international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.