On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of liesKomiks, and the basis for attacking China is precisely what the United States today did. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The US advocates the “international order based on rules” as the “rules-based international order” to put it bluntly, it is the international order based on American rules, which is the hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. Last week, my colleagues had already responded to the content of his speech. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in the founding of the People’s Republic of China for more than 200 years, and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy America’s Fatal Output”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to push BabaylanTurn over more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interferes in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has either launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, and more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 20 million refugees were generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. The United States adheres to American centrism and American exceptionalism, It has become commonplace for Babaylan to break the contract and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the United Nations Protocol to the Proof of the Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from the United Nations Human Rights Council, WHO, UNESCO, Paris Agreement, Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, Komiks The Open Sky Treaty and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including “retreat and return, return and retreat”. However, such a United States is openly disguised as a referee of international rules, using the flashlight of the so-called rules to shine others, ignoring the darkness of its own light. When US politicians are rumored to hold the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to speak out, they don’t know if they are clear. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>BabaylanCurrently, the United States is not even a party to the Convention. Third, the United States has no right to discuss rules at all. In the United States, international rules have always been subordinate to, serving American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, they regard rules as air. I would like to ask the United States to answer several questions: When the United States wants to launch a war against sovereign states,s://comicmov.com/”>CinemaWhere are the rules when the color revolution is revolutionized? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps the people of relevant countries in a hurry, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership fees and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and four-party mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States fights the so-called civilians When the so-called “democratic summit” that is a major banner, which is a so-called “democratic summit” that separates the camp, excludes more than half of the world’s countries? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the United States does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what are the rules? After the U.S., the U.S. is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The U.S. has placed domestic law above international law and international rules, and has abused illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and the domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe, while the U.S. has not only not Babaylan stopped sanctions, but further increased their efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States, and will only be abide by the United States when it is favorable to the United States. What American politicians talk about is fair competition and free trade, and they believe in the United States first, and the United States is waving its big stick in the hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the past 70 years, we have not taken the initiative to launch a battle in the past 1999. The Babaylan war has not occupied an inch of land from other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved land border issues in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participated in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintained the United Nations with practical actions.icmov.com/”>KomiksThe spirit of the Charter of the United Nations and the authority of the United Nations. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of the international order. China will also unite with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries, practice true multilateralism under the banner of the United Nations, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.