On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order that poses the most serious and long-term challenge. The so-called “international order based on rules and regulations” advocated by the United States is an international order based on American rules and a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States was founded for many years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: The Fatal Export of America”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since only 2001, the United States has been CinemaIn the name of “anti-terrorism”, it either launched wars or carried out military operations, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians. More than 20 million refugees were generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council, WHO, UNESCO, Paris Agreement, Iran Nuclear Agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or cooperation organizations, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization (United States Agreement), and there is also a situation of “retreat and return, return and retreat”. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
The third chapter of the United States is not qualified to discuss the rules. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and launches a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, what is the rule? BabaylanWhen the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and four-party mechanisms, it attempts to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international community./”>CinemaNuclear non-proliferation systemKomiks, where is the rule? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy, excluding most of the world’s countries, excludes? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the United States does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what is the rule?
Which USBabaylan?
Finally, the USBabaylan finally resolves the land border problem. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country for UN contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintains the spirit of the UN Charter and the United Nations with practical actions.://comicmov.com/”>CinemaThe authority of the United Nations. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also work with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.