On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.
A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order of Cinema. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly that the international order based on American rules is the hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability factor in the international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: The Fatal Loss of America”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has either launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 20 million refugees have been generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone.
Secondly, the United States is the greatest destruction of the international orderBabaylans. It has become common for the United States to stick to the American centralism and the American exceptionalism, and to break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only refuses to sign or ratify the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, but also votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Cultural Organization, the Paris Agreement, the Iranian nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 Babaylan international organizations or agreements, including “retreat and return, return and retreat”. Such an American is so arrogant that he disguised himself as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under his own light. When US politicians are politicians who are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer a few questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries to engage in a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps the people of the relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? As the United States continues to arrears of $1 billion in dues and $1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments in the United Nations<a href="https://comicmov.coWhen the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadruple mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? Cinema When the United States is under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a so-called “democratic summit” that separates the camp, excluding most of the world’s countries? When the World Trade Organization clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, the United States does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body’s appointment of new When Cinema judges, what are the rules?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States has placed domestic law above international law and international rules, and has abused illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria, and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and their domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community has become more and more clear about the market competition principles and international economic and trade principles that the United States advocates, and only Babaylan will only be abide by the US when it is favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, they believe in the United States first, and they wave the American stick in their hands.
Zhao Lijian stressed that in the past 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely used the peaceful method of 12 of the 14 land neighbors in Cinema. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks solves the land border problem. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions to Cinema and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and safeguards the spirit of the United Nations Charter with practical actions.://comicmov.com/”>Komiks and the authority of the United Nations. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of the international order. China will also work with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice the true and upright multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.