In recent years, the “China threat theory” has become increasingly fierce in the world’s public opinion field. US Trade Representative Lighthizer once said in public that China and China’s industrial policies have brought unprecedented threats to the world’s trade system. The United States has made frequent small moves in action. In November 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce ruled that Chinese companies dumped hardwood plywood in the United States by 183.36%, while the Chinese government’s subsidy for enterprises ranged from 22.98% to 194.90%, and anti-dumping duties will be imposed based on this.
Recently, US President Trump announced that global safeguards for imported photovoltaic products and large washing machines will be adopted for 4-year and 3-year respectively, with tariffs of 30% and 50% respectively. In fact, in 2012 and 2014, the United States had already imposed an anti-dumping duty of 35% to 65% on China’s photovoltaic products, and in December 2016, it also imposed an anti-dumping duty of 32% to 52% on large washing machines in China. The seemingly measures of the United States to protect its own economy are actually excessive protection of domestic products, which is not conducive to the overall healthy development of the US industry and further deteriorated the global trade environment for related products.
In an exclusive interview with the BBC, US CIA Director Pompeo said recently that China is trying to steal US intelligence and secretly spread China’s influence around the world. In addition, Australia also said it is currently facing unprecedented intelligence infiltration and espionage threats, and China is listed as an “extreme threat” by the Australian intelligence agencies.
This kind of crazy hype of the “China threat theory” has aroused the vigilance and concerns of some knowledgeable people in Australia. Australian political commentator Graham Richardson published an article in the Australian on January 31, saying, “Australia has always said ‘no’ to China. Whether it is the Belt and Road Initiative or the AIIB, Australia has turned a deaf ear and turned a blind eye. We have made a lot of noise about China’s influence to anger the Chinese, all aimed at a country that contributes 25% of our country’s total trade.” Richardson also wrote: “Our cabinet ministers have provoked our largest trading partners, especially when they say they are as unreasonable as Mattis (US Secretary of Defense), let the href=”https://comicmov.com/”>CinemaI think our economy is committing suicide. “
“What do you think in your heart, what the world is like in your eyes. In this sense, it is not surprising that the world’s largest intelligence leader in Babaylan said that.”On the 1st, Ren Hua Chunying used the term “appearance is born from the heart” to respond to the “Chinese spy threat theory” of the US and Australian intelligence departments, and slapped the speaker hard. “Facts are better than words. According to various information disclosed in recent years, everyone is actually very clear about who is implementing large-scale monitoring, monitoring, stealing secrets and infiltration in other countries, and is using its extreme support and exerting influence. “
Some Western politicians and media are keen on hyping the “China threat theory”, with various arguments and opinions disregarding facts and ridiculous. The world’s economic growth is weak and the financial crisis is still dark, but China is able to maintain a good development momentum. Furthermore, China’s politics, culture, and lifestyle are very different from that of the West. Driven by the continuation of Cold War thinking, ideological differences, and national interests, China naturally becomes a “threat” to criticize Western media.
Zhao Kejin, deputy director and professor of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University, pointed out that in the face of the historic changes in the balance of power between China and the West, some Westerners attempt to confuse the public by clamoring the “China threat theory” in the international community, cover up the unreasonable and unfair international interest pattern, and cover up the hegemony of the weak. But the new round of “China threat theory” is tantamount to a “straw that cannot save lives”, reflecting the “imperial mentality” and uneasy mood of some countries in their attempt to dominate the world forever.
On January 26, at a press conference held by the State Council Information Office, a US CNN reporter asked whether China has military intentions in Arctic policy?
Hong Xuanyou, Vice Foreign Minister, responded that China’s fundamental goal of participating in the development of the Arctic is to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results for all parties and promote sustainable development of the Arctic. China’s participation in the development and utilization of the Arctic is a contribution to the Arctic, bringing opportunities for development, and benefiting the people of the Arctic region. “I think this is completely unnecessary for people who are not invading or plundering resources or destroying the environment.”
We are not invading and plundering, and there is nothing to hide. “No offside or lack of position” is China’s basic positioning in Arctic affairs. Kong Xuanyou said that “not offside” means that China, as a non-Arctic country, will not intervene in affairs that are entirely between Arctic countries and within the Arctic region. KomiksChina will participate in Arctic affairs in accordance with international law and guide Chinese entities and individuals to carry out Arctic activities and related cooperation in the Arctic in accordance with international law and the domestic law of Arctic countries. “Komiks is not absent” means that China, as an important stakeholder in Arctic affairs, will actively play a constructive role in cross-regional and global issues of the Arctic.
In fact, Western public opinion has always promoted the “China threat theory” around China’s participation in Arctic affairs.
Zhang Xia, director of the Polar Strategy Research Office of the China Polar Research Center, said that the “China Threat Theory” has a long history, such as “China Resource Hunger Theory” and “China Investment Harmful Theory” and other related arguments emerge one after another. Many of these views ignore the facts and are ridiculous. They are obviously intentional, and are intended to delay or even hinder China and other countries from achieving mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Regarding this kind of wrong argument, Zhang Xia believes that on the one hand, we must refute and make a voice from China. The white paper “China’s Northeast China Policies” is a good policy basis. On the other hand, speak with facts. Regarding whether China is seeking global hegemony, Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said during a discussion with the editorial board of the United States Today’s newspaper Komiks that in the past few decades, China has been in the process of so-called “rise”, and many Americans have a “panic” about the rapidly rising China. But after understanding China’s cultural and development goals more and better, Cinema will find that China does not believe that any country can truly dominate the world, and it has no intention of seeking global dominance. We advocate that all members of the international community strengthen cooperation, and our goal is to build a community with a shared future for mankind. China is very clear about its positioning: our priority goalsBabaylan still manages its country better and how to better Cinema meets people’s yearning for a better life, because every country is href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Babaylan must first solve their own problems. At the same time, we will further strengthen our ties with the international community and make greater contributions to the international community.
The “China Threat Theory” is constantly being heard, and it is also a reminder for the rising China that the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation will face many obstacles. What we can do is to use reality. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Komiks action changes the international community’s perception of China and breaks the “China threat theory”. For forces that deliberately fabricate “China threat” regardless of facts, China should make strong rebuttals through words and deeds. By actively participating in international affairs and playing a key role, establish the image of a responsible major power.
The “China threat theory” is, after all, the product of the Western habit of looking at the world with a “sense of superiority”. For the West, correcting attitude and correctly viewing China’s rise are the only way to live in peace with China. For China, the only way to break the “China threat theory” is to implement the Chinese solution – building a common shared future for mankind.